Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars clone trooper legions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 08:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Star Wars clone trooper legions

List of Star Wars clone trooper legions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Vague definition of what a "legion" is ("just a group"), suggesting WP:OR for some entries' inclusion here (e.g. "squads" and "regiments"). In general, looks like an arbitrary list of non-notable make-believe units. No citations to reliable sources. --EEMeltonIV 18:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. Fails WP:NOR.--Bryson 19:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Transwiki to Wookieepedia - No notablity established for these and no citations Corpx 19:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Yet more listcruft, and as per WP:NORPedro |  Chat  20:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - So in-universe and devoid of references as to be potentially unsalvageable, little reason to believe that some of the groups described in the article exist in any officially released fiction from Lucasarts et al, no assertion of notability. I'd be a little iffy on even transwiki'ing it in its current state. MrZaius^talk 15:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-noteable, unreferenced and uninteresting to the average reader. If there was some clear military structure behind the 'Clone trooper legions' then perhaps this could be downsized and placed into an appropriate star wars related article but its effectively just a list of random fictional military units. WikipedianProlific^(Talk) 16:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.