Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New Zealand supercentenarians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of New Zealand supercentenarians

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are only 2 confirmed supercentenarians included in this article. Removing all non-supercentenarians would leave insufficient material to justify 1 list let alone 3. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 05:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There isn't enough data to sustain this article. Majority of the names on the page aren't even supercentenarians. The salvageable information (The two verified and one pending case) can found in other existing longevity articles. CommanderLinx (talk) 11:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom DOCUMENT★ERROR 12:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.