Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Menteris Besar of Negeri Sembilan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 10:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Menteris Besar of Negeri Sembilan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN. Bbb23 (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Chief executive of a first-level subdivision of a sovereign state is inherently notable. If you so resort to arguing against its notability by suggesting it's not notable as a list, then perhaps we should just call it "Menteri Besar of Negeri Sembilan". —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 21:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Derisory nomination for the reasons given by Yk Yk Yk. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a chief executive-related list that is inherently notable as reason from Yk Yk Yk - WPSamson (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.