Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mangalore people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 19:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mangalore people

Unsourced listing of everybody in town. Alexf⁴² 10:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with Category:People from Mangalore as per precedent. Relata refero (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keep really needed to have a separate article for people fro mangalore , all the people mentioned r highly notable . --@ the $un$hine . (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & merge to List of people from Karnataka need not have a separate article for every city , this such individual work will damage articles like a list of notable people of every state or at least duplicate it or possibility of informations going missing due to duplicating resources .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Feel we do not need lists of people from various cities.Pharaoh of the Wizards ([[User

talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards|talk]]) 16:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete As nom. Do we need lists of everything and everyone? - - Alexf⁴² 16:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, could be cleaned up, but nothing wrong with this per WP:CLS. We have no such precedent that lists of people by city are inappropriate. The nomination is also incorrect as my math shows that the list only include 0.01% of the population of the city. --Dhartung | Talk 22:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A perfectly reasonable summary style fork of Mangalore. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I created this page only to remove the clutter from the Mangalore page. Feel free to delete it.--PremKudva^Talk 11:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- the article creator has come himself to delete the article so we now can close this discussion --@ the $un$hine . (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Sunshine, doesn't work that way in an AfD. Noroton (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep The list does, in fact, give a bit more information than a category would -- it lists people by the subject that they're notable in. It would be even better to have a list with birth/death years and a few words about the person (therefore "weak"), but at some point that may happen. Noroton (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No context. Indiscriminate population list. B.Wind (talk) 04:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment : finally i think we are towards the Delete & merge consensus . --@ the $un$hine . (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I respect the wish of the creator. –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.