Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball recruiting history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball recruiting history

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Kentucky basketball-flavored case of WP:LISTCRUFT. The article has a number of issues as it is - it's outdated, it's unsourced, it doesn't do enough to distinguish itself as more notable than a potential List of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball players, the name makes no sense - but even if all of those issues were fixed, I don't see where this makes sense to be broken out separately, instead of merging the relevant info into Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball. fuzzy510 (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Kentucky. fuzzy510 (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Basketball. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia certainly is NOT Rivals.com or MaxPreps. This is of interest only to a niche group of recruiting fans. Nate • (chatter) 20:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with nom that while a list of players generally may be appropriate, organizing by recruit class is not. Reywas92^Talk 23:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.