Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese researchers of Daoism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Japanese researchers of Daoism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable topic, and most don't have articles. No refs and no clarity on who can be included. Possible ATD is merge/redirect to Daoism in Japan article, but I don't think it is notable enough for even a sub-section. Was in CAT:NN and CAT:UNREF for 6 years. Boleyn (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article has no sources and list doesn't seen notable. lullabying (talk) 09:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This reads like a pointless encylopedia entry with no references. Whiteguru (talk) 11:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. list doesn't seen notable. Nika2020 (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 12:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.