Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of German presidents by longevity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of heads of state by longevity (batch 2)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial cross-categorisations ("age at death" and "former political office holder") which are also statistical trivia and which fail to cite a single source, thus mot meeting either of WP:V or WP:LISTN, and probably violating WP:OR. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. Fails WP:V, WP:LISTN, and likely with serious WP:OR issues. The various related articles, such as List of heads of state of Greece, are all we need and of a far higher quality, not these redundant WP:TRIVIA regurgitations. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:NOTSTATS — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all passes WP:NLIST and scrapes by WP:GNG in my opinion 2001:8003:24D1:A000:2CEB:C26A:6ECD:B209 (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC) — 2001:8003:24D1:A000:2CEB:C26A:6ECD:B209 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note The above IP had an incorrect and misleading signature. This was corrected. Additionally, on the substance of the comment; opinions that something meets GNG are not worth anything if they are not substantiated by actual sources. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All pass WP:SYNTH, WP:NLIST, WP:NOTSTATS. Recent precedent shows consensus that these types of lists are definitely encyclopedic. Green Hook 1224 (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2021 (UTC) — Green Hook 1224 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
@Green Hook 1224 Can you provide link to that discussion? — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's simply too many of these list articles, IMHO. GoodDay (talk) 17:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.