Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of County cricket coaches and captains

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of County cricket coaches and captains

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. No citations; is not being updated and is out of date; fails WP:NOTSTATS and WP:UNCLETOMCOBLEYANDALL. Waste of space. Jack | ^{talk page} 14:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - these are not policy reasons to delete. We're trying to assess whether the subject is notable independent of the current state of the page - and it would seem to me to be fairly obvious that most of the information on this page is able to be cited. JMWt (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. WP:NOSTATS is a strong reason to delete any article. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lists of current captains and coaches can be found at the appropriate season articles, e.g., 2016 County Championship#Teams. No need to have duplicate information. IgnorantArmies (talk) 07:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per IA. This seems to be a good idea when it was created, but essentially has become a stale draft. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the content is much better kept at the season articles and/or the team articles. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' - I PRODed this last year, and I'm still of the opinion it doesn't meet the inclusion criteria, as stated above PinchHittingLeggy (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.