Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Championship Wrestling From Hollywood personnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Championship Wrestling From Hollywood personnel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable article. CWFH is a very small promotion and doesn't need a personnel article (not every promotion needs these kind of articles). The website doesn't include a roster section, which is hard to source. The article states that "CWFH's roster consists mainly of independent freelancers.", so they aren't under a long time contract. 68 names in the article, but only two of them have articles. The whole article has only 5 sources HHH Pedrigree (talk) 06:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. jp×g 06:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. jp×g 06:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this level of detail is definitely not needed for such a small promotion -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:LISTN. I also wasn't able to find enough sourcing for most of this to be verifiable. The only source I could find for this which would even approach usability is a database on cagematch.net. Which is not enough for notability or verifiability. Finally, although AFD is not cleanup and this could potentially be fixed, I'm also troubled by the entirely unsourced disclosure of personal information (real names of people who work under pseudonyms) for living people. Lowercaserho (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails General Notability guidelines as well. --Bejnar (talk) 23:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.