Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Rampur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Rampur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This kingdom has been defunct since 1949. This completely unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The ur.wiki article is sourced to RoyalArk, which is not a reliable source. Mccapra (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6. Nika2020 (talk) 05:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, full of original research. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The page for the most recent blue link has no sources for the claim he holds the Nawab of Rampur in pretense, so who knows if anyone in this family even cares about succession. JoelleJay (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:LIST. This is a list about a now-defunct, non-sovereign state's heads of state, and is moot. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater^talk 18:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.