Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalla Hirayama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 05:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lalla Hirayama

Lalla Hirayama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability Nswix (talk) 00:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, South Africa, and Japan. Justiyaya 05:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Dance. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She seems to have appeared in a large number of widely-watched TV shows. Park3r (talk) 03:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, notable individual. A WP:BEFORE provides substantial coverage in reliable sources, [1],[2],[3],[4]. The article is just poorly written and needs more references.-Xclusivzik (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, she's notable and high profile with many sources such as those Xclusivzik shows but also many others visible in searching. Fulmard (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist. Regarding the comment "many others visible in searching", it helps in AFD discussions to be more specific about what you have found searching. Please share.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's wide enough coverage in third-party sources, I think. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.