Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour targets for the 2010 United Kingdom general election

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:54, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Labour targets for the 2010 United Kingdom general election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not an excessive listing of statistics. This article is speculative regarding an election that already happened. I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Hekerui (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Excellent analysis of forthcoming election from a PoliSci point of view, but ephemeral by definition and destined for rapid obsolescence. Carrite (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all three due to them all now being obsolete, as it is dealing with an election that has been and gone. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all three, as per Ditzy. – OhioStandard (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.