Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyosei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kyosei

Non notable original research. Jenuk1985 | Talk 01:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be largely original research. --DAJF (talk) 03:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep possibly notable, esp. due to the connection with Canon (company); an actual concept and more than a dicdef per gsearch, but this article has significant issues. JJL (talk) 03:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nominator. Oda Mari (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is the Canon version of Corporate social responsibility, made their corporate philosophy. Therefore, one may want to elaborate on the Canon version in either the CSR article or in the Canon article, if properly sourced and summarized, but I am not interested in doing it myself. Kyōsei (共生) is a Japanese word meaning 1. "To live together", 2. symbiosis. Because of its first meaning, it is often used in the context of discussions like, for eg. "how human kind shall cope with the global warming of the Earth", and that's likely why you'll get hits on googling 共生. --Mantokun (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the basis of what DAJF, Oda Mari and Mantokun have written, unless the article is edited to add sources showing that the concept goes beyond one company's slogan for its social-responsibility program. Fg2 (talk) 11:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.