Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunwar (title)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With no further input since the 2 relists, it doesn't seem likely this is going to get any clear consensus. The suggestion to merge or redirect into Kunwar or even Kunwar (surname) is something that can be done outside of the AfD. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kunwar (title)

Kunwar (title) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to be a disambiguation page as similar page i.e a list article exist titled Kunwar, which contains name of people with Kunwar surname. It should be deleted and few names present here should be included in that particular article. Heba Aisha (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Kunwar (title) of Rajput tribes being used IN FRONT of people's names has far too long a history in the Indian subcontinent – India, Pakistan and Nepal, to be Deleted because it's still widely used in Pakistan, India and Nepal by people. I fully realize Wikipedia guidelines discourage it from being used in its Article Titles, but I see 'titles' such as Emperor, King, Lord, Sir, Chaudhry, Raja, Khan used all the time in the Wikipedia Infoboxes. As long as name titles are being used in the Real World out there by the people themselves, it would be unrealistic for Wikipedia to impose a total ban on the use of name titles on this encyclopedia. Does Encyclopedia Britannica call a King, a King in the main body of its articles? Kunwar (title) and Kunwar (surname) exist as separate Wikipedia articles for a very good reason. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Added 2 new references and 5 more categories to improve the article. Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge — Page is about same topic as of Kunwar and Kunwar (surname). It'll be better if we can merge all of these into one page (subjected to Notability). ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 04:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.