Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Ketkar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Train^talk 06:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Ketkar

Kumar Ketkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles by him are abundant. But, you replace the word by with about and Google seems to lead you to nowhere! A redirect target can be possibly sought. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The person here is a journalist and does appear on TV debates but does not qualify per Wikipedia notability guidelines. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He was editor in chief of a Marathi news paper with huge number of circulation. He is surely a notable person. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)This editor is the creator of the article.Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he probably ought to be notab le, but experience is it can be difficult to show for newspaper editors. If he is as conroveial as the article implies, there should be more references to find. If not, it can be redirected to the newspaper. DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment he has a Bloomberg bio with significantly more details than are in the article. [1] isn't reliable but is about him. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If you use the correct Google product it doesn't "lead you to nowhere". There are plenty of sources writing about the subject found by clicking on the word "books" in the search links above. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial non-sig. mention(s) in a group/horde of names.Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.