Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kongu piratti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kongu piratti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources. PROD was also removed by page's creator. Meatsgains (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If this article is to be kept, it needs a complete rewrite. Readers who are unfamiliar with Hindu tradition are unlikely to be able to make any sense out of this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No effort has been made since this AfD began to make this article any more comprehensible to those unfamiliar with the subject. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this article is a complete mess. I cannot tell from the article whether the subject is real or mythological, or if she is real, what millennium she lived in. The sources are not reliable. Turning this page into a valid encyclopedia article amounts to rewriting it in its entirety; there is nothing worth saving here. Huon (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.