Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiuma Kunioku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kiuma Kunioku

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter. Two top tier fights about 4 years ago but both were losses. Peter Rehse (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator Clearly meets WP:MMANOT I miscounted top tier fights (see below).Peter Rehse (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NMMA with 3 top tier World Victory Road Sengoku fights. LiberatorLX (talk) 07:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I counted only two but that was because of how it was named in the table with no accompanying text. This should be a Keep and I modified the table.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Isnt this like the third time you have made a mistake in nominations because you failed to count the correct amount of top tier fights? Maybe instead of mindlessly nominating articles for deletion you should take a closer look, it probably takes less time for you to thoroughly skim through said fight records to determine the amount of top tier fights than it did for you to nominate the articles for deletion....just my 2 cents. Sepulwiki (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.