Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ki-tae (military)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Ki-tae (military)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and only known for the WP:1E of his claimed involvement in the alleged Binh Tai Massacre. All relevant detail on this page is already covered on Binh Tai Massacre. Mztourist (talk) 05:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 05:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 05:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Sawol (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or change to redirect - I mostly agree. There isn't enough material to write a full article. However, since he was a high-ranking eyewitness, redirecting is also a reasonable idea.Katemeshi101 (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom assuming that no Korean sources can be adduced to show he is notable in other contexts. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.