Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenichi Osada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early per WP:SNOWBALL (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 09:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kenichi Osada

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is one PDF. It has no sections at all. Lead is made of only one sentence. It doesn't seem like the person is enough popular to has an article on Wikipedia. This is not an article. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 09:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being named an IEEE Fellow is an explicit pass of WP:PROF#C3. The link in that reference is not working for me, but here is a different link that verifies that distinction. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - adding more sources into the article. As a member of IEEE, subject passes NACADEMIC #3, also his work has been cited more than 4300 times as per Scholar citation - here [1]. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cassiopeia and the nom's own WP:AADD. ——SerialNumber54129 10:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per those above. Mosaicberry (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Despite the unusually stubby state of the article it already documents a clear pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PROF for the reasons stated above, though it would be nice to clarify whether he is currently at Hitachi (per the IEEE fellowship citation) or the Tokyo Institute of Technology (per GS). XOR'easter (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being named and pass of WP:PROF. -MA Javadi (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes of PROF and NACADEMIC. More coverage from Japanese sources is likely. feminist (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep Obviously passes WP:NPROF. Sandals1 (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.