Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Buckhaven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 02:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Buckhaven

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, no WP:RS. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep" - talented young English artist with at least three record releases. $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 15:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although hardly what I would consider a slam-dunk case of notability, I found enough sources to make me think that there's probably even more out there if I kept searching: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Most of them seem to be local papers, but there's an interview from BBC Radio and a review in The Guardian. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Improve - yes, there are definitely more adequate sources for this article, they just need to be found and NinjaRobotPirate has shown some of these. Very salvageable, therefore I oppose this nom. --The one that forgot (talk) 02:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.