Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Matsui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 04:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Matsui

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 03:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's because she is not an academic. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily passes the GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She is notable for being one of the few female senior bankers in Japan and also for coining "Womenomics". There is a bloomberg article, another bloomberg article and WSJ blog. This article in Forbes (though technically written by a former Goldman Sachs employee) also explains that she is one of the few public faces of Goldman Sachs. She is generally quoted/associated with "Womenomics" as it is her best known work - see [1],[2],[3] Considering that her work is being referred to by the Japanese Prime Minister (and she has been interviewed by NHK for her opinions), I think she is notable enough. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are enough sources to pass GNG as provided by Lemongirl942 Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Upon a review of available sources, the subject passes WP:BASIC. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.