Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Bateman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect to Kate Josephine Bateman reinstated. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Bateman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion declined, but this is an unsourced BLP about an auctioneer and antiques expert that has made occasional appearances (often not more than a few minutes) in a variety of BBC antiques TV programmes. I can't find any actual news coverage or independent reliable sources about her. If the unsourced biographical and family info was removed, there would be little left of any substance. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 01:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources are not independent. Notability not indicated.--Rpclod (talk) 05:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe redirect to one of the TV shows - A News search found a few links, Books found nothing and a browser search found links her BBC bio. Rather than deleting, I think a redirect to one of the TV shows, maybe Flog It (seems maybe she's received a little more attention for that one)? SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure a redirect to a TV show is the best idea, since there is an article on Kate Josephine Bateman. Perhaps Kate Bateman should just not be a link, or be changed back into the redirect to Kate Josephine Bateman that it started as. It won't need disambiguation if it doesn't remain an article. - Nunh-huh 19:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:BIO. --Inother (talk) 03:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.