Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Aksonova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Aksonova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An autobiography. The subject has been in long list of several local competitions but did not make it to short lists; she was an editor of a magazine of unclear significance, and about a half of the links are to this magazine; I assume if there are any further points to prove the notability, she would have added them to the article at creation. Ymblanter (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:A7. None of the cited sources directly establishes the topic of this article as significant: they are either her works, or about her works, and in the latter case don't establish those works as particularly notable. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - she keeps editing this article after she knows it's a violation of WP:COI, and that we know that she's just not notable. Go ahead, rearrange the deck chairs. Bearian (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per Ymblanter and Bearian. No evidence of significant secondary coverage per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.