Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaori Takahashi (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kaori Takahashi (actress)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has basically no content. Tyrosian (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A casual search shows that she verifiably passes WP:NACTOR#C1 with significant roles in notable film and TV dramas even as a child actress in the 1980s, not to mention starring TV roles in the 2000s. A few search hits: [1] [2] [3]. Here is a way to find more, using information that is already in the article: "高橋かおり". Content can be added by anyone. Bakazaka (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Have added content and sources, and nominator has specified no other reason for deletion. More sources obviously available for later expansion. Bakazaka (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily passes WP:NACTOR due to prominent roles as said in the article and in the WP:BEFORE search of the Japanese article, and easily passes WP:GNG as Bakazaka has shown. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.