Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kakkazhom puthukkulangara bhagavathi temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kakkazhom puthukkulangara bhagavathi temple

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable temple; no significant coverage for it appears to exist. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't find any evidence online that it even exists. Even if everything were sourceable, none of the information given in any way proves this temple is notable as I see it. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor temple to a local deity sourced only to Google maps. --Auric talk 13:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:V Quinton Feldberg (talk) 01:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.