Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaba, Lord Shiva Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaba, Lord Shiva Temple

Kaba, Lord Shiva Temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Implicitly contested prod. Unreferenced and potentially controversial assertion; looks like original research. Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

Kaaba(Shiva Temple) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

and the entire list of contributions of Kaushal irm (talk · contribs), which all revolve around this article. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've redirected the prodded duplicate Kaaba(Shiva Temple) to this article, since this one was AFD'd. MuffledThud (talk) 11:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - There is some material about this idea online, but most of it seems highly speculative and dependent upon unusual interpretations of existing religious texts. If WP:RS can be cited, then there's a slim possibility of a keep, so best to give the author time to find some. MuffledThud (talk) 11:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 15:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: POV pushing, no WP:RS about theory. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As far as conspiracy theories go, this isn't notable. -SpacemanSpiff 18:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.