Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KMHF-FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Mets501 (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KMHF-FM

This station apparently doesn't exist. There's no listing for the call sign at the FCC database. I found this page searching for the call letters, but that links to [1] which isn't responsive, and according to WHOIS, isn't owned; that it's in REDEMPTIONPERIOD since July 6, 2006. The article was created blank, got an Infobox, an expand tag, my link to the FMQ template, and nothing else has happened. Since I can't confirm it exists, it's either not notable, defunct, or a hoax. Mikeblas 08:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as per A1 and A3 --- Lid 08:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm trying to imagine how maybe some misunderstanding led to this situation, but the lack of an FCC entry is a very definitive indicator in my experience. Snacky 14:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I'm figuring the station existed at one time, but has shut down. I can't figure out a way to query the FCC database (interactively) for old licences, and haven't been able to find a news story about it. -- Mikeblas 16:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. See a source that lists the existence of the station. There are other sources. If the station existed, then going out of business is not a reason to delete. Vegaswikian 22:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I'd be all for keeping it if it had an interesting history or was particularly notable before it went off the air. But I can't find any reference that gives a history, or indicates the station had a notable past. A vote to keep an empty article that won't grow is a vote to defer the inevitable. -- Mikeblas 00:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.