Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jun Kusanagi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jun Kusanagi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Being called "one of Japan's most prolific and popular photo model/AV stars" by a nn website is an insufficient claim of significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable performer of pronography. To be fair Wikipedia is cluttered with articles on such non-notable people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree there doesn't seem to be significant noteworthy information cited or available about this person. Misterpottery (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GNG & all that shizz. –Davey2010^Talk 02:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.