Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan McKechnie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 00:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan McKechnie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has possibly played less than one minute of football at the professional level to scrape a passing of WP:NFOOTBALL. Conducting a WP:BEFORE search, I can find little evidence to support WP:GNG. The best source was this match report. There is clear consensus that passing GNG is more important in such cases as this. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - might meet NFOOTBALL, might not - but more importantly does fail GNG. Giant Snowman 20:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I really think if you have made one substitute appearance at second tier level then that is not grounds in itself for having an article, and would agree with the above view that he fails GNG. Dunarc (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.