Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Rea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Rea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable boxer. Suarez Mason (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet WP:NBOX and won only 10 of his 42 professional fights. The coverage is insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not yet better applicable for the boxing notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable boxer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.