Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Job skirt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Job skirt

Job skirt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have done a search for sources, but can't find anything beyond this article to show that a job skirt is a thing. Although technically it's well-written and appropriately toned, it does seem a bit How To and subjective/personal opinion. The searches I did by phrase pulled up a LOT of hits for "job. Skirt" (where a sentence ends with "job" and skirt is the first word in the following sentence). I looked up a related phrase I KNEW was definitely a "thing", interview suit, and see it ended up being redirected to Suit (clothing). Mabalu (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article makes sense and I can totally see this as notable, but no sources to back that up. Maybe wait till other publications cover this. Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with you about this - it sounds good, and sounds as if it ought to be notable, but there are zero sources. Similarly I don't see anything article-wise for Job shirt, Job suit, or even Office dress/Office dress code, which would seem to be the logical home for something like this if it were notable. Plus presumably a job skirt would vary depending on the job! Mabalu (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems like a neologism. A "job skirt" is just Business casual. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone else. Eman235/talk 13:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect or Delete. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.