Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Cohn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Cohn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

American academic without significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent (third-party) sources. (?) As for the scholar notability guideline, he is an associate (not full) prof, and has fairly low Google Scholar citations. Biggest book is "Anarchism and the crisis of representation", held in 183 libraries, but even that doesn't appear to have been reviewed widely enough to be independently notable. No other potential redirect targets. czar 07:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. czar 07:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar 07:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar 07:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. czar 07:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF and I can't find the significant level of reliably published book reviews that might let him clear the lower bar of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability unclear. NickCT (talk) 07:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rather weak keep. Some impact on opinion as judged by GS cites. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete It's surprising that someone who has been such a prolific author hasn't attracted the level of reviews that WP:AUTHOR requires, but there you go. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.