Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Human Rights Commission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball keep (non-admin closure). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Human Rights Commission

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleate it is an attack pageSillyPotatoe (talk) 11:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Purely frivolous bad-faith nomination for deletion.TheLongTone (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - The article presents several points of view and is abundantly sourced. A for the nominator.- Mr X 15:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep - per above. Nominator should read WP:BOOMERANG. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is clearly an attack page. Saying the organisation are basically terrorists — Preceding unsigned comment added by SillyPotatoe (talk • contribs) 21:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bad faith nomination. Theroadislong (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.