Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inuko Inuyama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meowth. Don't usually close on 1 !vote however participation's been extremely low and the !keep was pretty much a redirect so am closing as redirect (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inuko Inuyama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ANN search results:

1) Midori no Makibao (Midori - main [show itself is non-notable])

2) Meowth (Pokemon - main antagonist)

3) Manta Oyamada (Shaman King - main)

Subject is argubably best known as Meowth on the internationally acclaimed Pokemon series, but not necessarily known for anything else. Subject's page should probably be redirected to Meowth. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 13:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. This is very much like the situation for Mike Pollock, where she has one strongly notable role in a broad franchise. She did voice a main in Shaman King, and voices monsters in Love & Peace (film). But it's pretty much all Pokemon. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with no objection to converting to a redirect. – Allen4names (contributions) 15:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nominator. I want to put a Pokemon joke in here but can't think of one. Alas, the subject is not notable, but we can preserve the history in case she ever becomes such, and it is a possible search term. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.