Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inna discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Discographies are standard when a sufficient number of discs have been released. Content decisions must be debated on the pertaining talk page. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inna discography

Inna discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proper sources, suggest redirect to Inna. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 08:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As with all Inna albums and songs, the sourcing is atrocious. She apparently has nothing like a press agent working to make official announcements. Instead, there are interviews she has with bloggers, and the contradictory things she says are interpreted different ways by other bloggers. Huge questions remain about this or that album being official, or what is its name. Relevant discussions include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LatINNA (Inna Album) (deleted), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Romantic Collection (deleted), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer Days (EP) (merged). We have always had great difficulty figuring out what this artist is doing, because the sources are so bad. Binksternet (talk) 08:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I see that you nominated the article 'Inna discography' for deletion. Well, it contains much information about her chart peaks and certifications throughout her seven years of career. You're right about some dubious links, but do not delete the article immediately(!!!!!!); let me know what poblems you found on Inna's discography page, so I can fix it for you!! I can explain you the things you discussed in "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inna discography": "LatINNA" is not the title of one of her albums: It is just the former name of her now-renamed full-length record INNA (The title was simply renamed from LatINNA to INNA). There is no album by her named "The Romantic Collection", it's just an unofficially collection of her tracks that premiered on an illegal website. And finally, the "Summer Days EP" was supposed to be released, but never was. Thus, most of the track released from it were included on Inna's actual album INNA. Have any questions?- Then simply ask me! --Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: While the article needs extensive work to conform to the generally accepted style guidelines, a reduction in the lead, and cleaning of fancruft, I'm seeing enough reliable sources backing up discography-related content to satisfy. Azealia911 _talk 01:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: as AfD is not cleanup. The lead needs to be reduced and fancruft needs to be removed, but the core of the article (i.e. the list of albums, singles, music videos, charting positions) looks valid and eventually easily fixable in its few inaccurancies. Cavarrone 15:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.