Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InMarq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by Orangemike per WP:A7. WP:NAC NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

InMarq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. If I read it correct, a company without a product on the market. No sources in the article that say something about the organisation. The Banner talk 23:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This whole thing is an imaginary future history, which explains why none of the sources appear to mention the subject or any of the wonderfullness promised in the article. Why would they? It doesn't exist yet. Unfortunately for the authors of this article, WP is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. I predict this article will soon be gone, baby, gone. Msnicki (talk) 04:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.