Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immanuels Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Requires additional sourcing, but AfD is not for cleanup. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Immanuels Church

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to significance other than having more than 2,000 members, fails WP:ORG LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 05:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 05:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 05:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Lots of hits on gnews, if one searches with the apostrophe. In any case, they have 4000 members now - they had 2000 members back in 1996, according to The Washington Times.[1] Besides, looking over past deletion debates, there seems to be a rough consensus that megachurches are notable. St Anselm (talk) 06:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep also based on the rough consensus on megachurches. It does need some additional referencing/citations added, but that shouldn't be too difficult. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.