Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Watson (scientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Watson (scientist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:PROF. He is IEEE member, but I don't think that's sufficient. Pcap ping 21:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 21:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to satisfy notability guidelines at WP:ACADEMIC. Lots of people can gain membership to IEEE (myself included) but WP:ACADEMIC criterion #3 requires the person to be an IEEE Fellow, which has much more stringent membership criteria. I looked over his CV and don't see anything to indicate he meets WP:BIO either. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Associate professor and two books do not make him notable. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:PROF - --208.59.93.238 (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. ^^^ JBsupreme (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 01:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.