Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hwem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hwem

Hwem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources and I cannot find any reference to this article on Google. Listed artists all have redlinks. —Panamitsu (talk) 01:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Panamitsu (talk) 01:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, Websites, and Sweden. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Mentioned on Discogs; apparently this label has been defunct since 2008 and their website is no longer registered. I hate to see a niche recording label disappear from history, but they apparently never made enough impact to be covered in any searchable secondary sources, thus failing WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article was written by an account claiming to be Thomas Toivonen (AfD discussion) who also wrote Kaburu (AfD discussion), one of the things listed in this article, so it's likely going to be one of those cases where the subject was only ever documented by its creator, writing directly in Wikipedia content that couldn't ever be verifiable because it wasn't documented by the world at large, exactly as one shouldn't. Uncle G (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.