Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Emlyn-Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nom hasn't even bothered with searching for sources as these have all been nominated within seconds of each other. No objections to speedy renomination by anyone except the nom. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Emlyn-Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed parliamentary candidate and non-notable circuit judge. If he were a High Court judge I wouldn't nominate. Uhooep (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not just a parliamentary candidate, not just a circuit judge; notable - entry in Who's Who (UK) with portraits of him held by the National Portrait Gallery. Graemp (talk) 08:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: For reasons listed above. Ross-c (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no reason to delete. Andrew D. (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.