Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honō no Tōkyūji: Dodge Danpei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) !dave 12:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honō no Tōkyūji: Dodge Danpei

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. - MrX 04:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 05:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 05:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the Megadrive Video game is reviewed by Megadrive Advanced Gaming, and a Japanese review of the NES version. There's also a mobygames and Giant Bomb links for the games, but I'm not sure that all makes it pass GNG. Lee Vilenski(talk) 10:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Do you really think that a media franchise that consists of a television series that aired on a major network, and seven video games would fail GNG? What does need to happen is for the cut and paste move to be reverted; the article previously existed at Honō no Dōkyūji: Dodge Danpei, and it can be moved afterwards if necessary. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The seven video game releases is a bit of a misnomer, as it's one game released for several platforms, and an expansion labelled as a sequel. Not that it makes it any less notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 02:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Online coverage for the series will probably be hard to find considering its age, but surely a show that aired on national television for a year passes WP:TVSERIES? Also, there does seem to be reviews for the game, so there's that. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.