Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HomeCo. Armstrong Creek Town Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HomeCo. Armstrong Creek Town Centre

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding evidence that the individual locations (to be listed below shortly) of HomeCo are notable per WP:GNG & WP:CORP. It may be possible that HomeCo itself, as an organization, is notable, after a brief source search, but these are all about individual locations. ASUKITE 13:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls, Organizations, Business, Companies, and Australia. ASUKITE 13:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per above, I am also nominating the following related articles:

Support per above. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nominator. None of these individual locations are notable to have their own article. Nothing to merge/redirect to either, as there is no individual article for HomeCo itself. Ajf773 (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all all fail WP:GNG and WP:NCORP/WP:NPLACE. Primary references and a mention in a bus timetable are hardly WP:SIGCOV. Hughesdarren (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I agree HomeCo itself might be notable, but each store location is not. TH1980 (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as above. Note: HomeCo. Cranbourne should also be deleted if the above are deleted.--Grahame (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all and delete the Cranbourne article too as per Grahemec - none of the articles seem to have any sort of significant coverage, so there doesn't even seem anything that could be merged into the local suburb articles. Deus et lex (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - as per nom and above editors. Nothing but routine local coverage, all fail GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Members of a chain of mini malls with strictly routine coverage. An article about the parent company might be interesting, while it's holdings are not. However, even that appears to come up short on WP:NCORP. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.