Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Holistic Design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sending to afd due to removed prod - notability. no references other then the companies website. Tracer9999 (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — Frankie (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see how this article or the articles of the several linked games have survived. There are no references in the company page. Going to the game pages to look for refs that support the company shows that they have no refs either... unless you count unlinked refs to the game manuals. Also, there is no claim of notability (also largely true for the game titles as well. My only question is why didn't anyone Nominate Hammer of the Gods, Final Liberation, Machiavelli the Prince, Merchant Prince II, Emperor of the Fading Suns, and Mall Tycoon. Celtechm (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Perhaps a symptom of a larger issue—most of the RPG-related related articles are similarly unsourced and quite possibly not notable. Most of the articles make no effort to establish notability in the lead, mainly because there isn't any. I PROD'd several of this company's more obviously not-notable video game subpages as per Celtechm's comment above. czar · · 19:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added some refs. -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Probably just about notable. --Rotten regard (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Most of their games are notable, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Can't find broad coverage on the company itself in sources. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:38, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.