Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduism in England

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep . This with the nominator's rationale does not belong at AfD. Merging is an editorial decision that should be discussed on the article's talk page. - filelake shoe 23:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in England

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already covered by Hinduism in the United Kingdom.--tHeMaNe2 Talk 1:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Rename This is the main article in the series, so rename to Hinduism in the United Kingdom and merge the other three (which are mainly reports of statistics) here. (I will suggest some changes to the article on its talk page as well.)Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge / Redirect, and that goes for the others. Deletion is unnecessary and counterproductive. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect following the reasoning of User:Night Gyr. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The article is perfectly valid existing in its own right. To delete or merge articles because the information could be included in an article about a larger geographical area will lead to the removal of thousands of articles. This is a not what Wikipedia should be about. Fishiehelper2 (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per comments at Hinduism in Scotland nomination. The article requires significant expansion, not deletion. Ben Mac Dui 18:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- UK or Great Brittan should the top level article, but this one can stay. Wikid ^as© 21:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.