Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu fascist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu fascist

Hindu fascist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fork of Hinduism, difficult to make POV almost a G10 ϢereSpielChequers 12:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - POV fork and no scope to turn it into article.Wikid^as© 15:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: WP:OR and POV fork. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article does not have any sources that any such concept exists. One of the sources for the article says, "The primary "justification" given by fascist Hindus -- including the then Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee [PM 1998-2004]...." TFD (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• What about the redirect to hindutva that this started out as? It doesn't require the deletion tool to simply go back to that. Uncle G (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not comfortable with negative redirects like that. Yes we could make this a redirect to hindutva or indeed Sangh Parivar, as both contain allegations that some Marxists have described them as Hindu Fascists. But is it right to have such pejorative redirects? ϢereSpielChequers 15:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.