Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haulmont

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 July 7.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The concensus is that the company does not meet the criteria for inclusion, and the platform (which is one of their products) likewise fails to meet this. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:45, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haulmont

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company not referenced at length in independent, third party sources, so it fails the general notability guideline. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because it's a product made by the company which similarly fails the WP:GNG---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC):[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if Haulmont article fails the WP:GNG, then why CUBA Platform page should be deleted? It has over 3000 registrations over the past year and community is growing rapidly. I don't think that it is a wise decision to delete it just because company developer seems to break GNG. Also CUBA Platform has recently changed its licensing and became free for all. I do think that Wikipedia should support this kind of products. Taking in consideration all above we ask you to reconsider this request for deletion. Aleksey.stukalov (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC) copied from the talk page clpo13_(talk) 21:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC) — Aleksey.stukalov (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note that Aleksey.stukalov identifies as a technology evangelist for CUBA, and has an obvious COI. Guy (Help!) 14:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guy, I don't hide my position (it even appears on my user's wiki page) and don't see any problem sharing my own opinion and facts that I can prove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksey.stukalov (talk • contribs) 14:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, Haulmont is a finalist of European IT and Software Excellence Awards in nomination of Vertical Market Solution of the Year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksey.stukalov (talk • contribs) 21:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any independent, reliable sources that discuss the company/product at length? Just being a finalist in one competition without any further elaboration hardly counts as significant coverage and isn't enough to build a Wikipedia article. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CUBA Platform is a fairly new but it's definitly growing fast. It has quite large community, that can be proved by my blog traffic (road-to-cuba-and-beyond.com). Additionally i post a lot of blog posts on sites like DZone or JAXenter and all of them seem to think that the platform is "relevant" enough. One article on DZone even got 100k pages views. The framework has been recently open sourced and due to this it will increase in relevance and popularity. CUBA as well as Haulmont have become known (generally notable) in the world of java enterprise applications development for the past year. From that perspective I'm against the deletion of the articles. Additionally i was just trying to translate the CUBA Platform article to the german wikipedia and i'm not really sure why this should be deleted at all.mariomddavid (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC) — mariomddavid (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
I do not believe that this page should be deleted. In fact, the CUBA platform is a rapidly growing enterprise platform in the JAVA world with a growing presence in the Americas. This page will be very useful as an introduction to enterprise software and for evaluation purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisnzeutem (talk • contribs) 14:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC) — Francisnzeutem (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete as obvious promotion. Guy (Help!) 14:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete as promotion and failing WP:NOTABILITY. This may be rescue-able if some clueful Wikipedia wanted to take this on, but I don't think so. The !votes to keep so far are not based on Wikipedia's WP:NOTABILITY criteria; those folks seem to really like this software but that is not relevant here. Jytdog (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as obvious winners of the European IT and Software Excellence Awards.62.69.22.17 (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— 62.69.22.17 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

In addition to being a single purpose account, the IP editor above is based in the Russian headquarters of Haulmont. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 11:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.