Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyakuten! Ippatsuman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom hasn't even bothered searching for sources so thus BEFORE wasn't followed, No objections to renomination by anyone else (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 15:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gyakuten! Ippatsuman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Rathfelder (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A common outcome at AfDs is that "Television series broadcast nationally by a major network or produced by a major studio are usually kept as they are considered notable." This one fulfills both as it was broadcast by Fuji TV and produced by Tatsunoko. Plus, the Japanese Wikipedia version has sources; the first one indicates that it was extended for six episodes because of its popularity. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The first two sources [1] show some notability. This needs to be looked into though, the main issue is third party coverage. It doesn't matter how notable a network is, we cant use all primary sources as it can also be seen as WP:PROMOTION. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Listed in Anime Encyclopedia [2] for third-party, among other related Time Bokan series, all of which have independent articles. Media Arts DB has a listing for the show, but no detail on episode titles. [3] and this book mentions a director on that show [4] It can be restructured to be like a season-level show under Time Bokan. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.