Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Cassidy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Cassidy

Grace Cassidy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress may not meet WP:NACTOR or the lower WP:GNG. I couldn't find any significant third party coverage of the actress. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep [1]. You do realise she was an actor on Emmerdale for three years, which is a UK national TV programme that goes out twice a week, and is hugely popular. Although I haven't watched it for donkeys, I suspect she would be instantly recognisable to most folk in the UK. I think WP:THREE applies as she is only at the beginning of her career. scope_creep^Talk 10:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tyw7: I guess your not watching it either. scope_creep^Talk 10:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scope creep, well WP:NACTRESS says multiple significant roles:

"Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."

But it seems she was only known for one role. However, she doesn't have a lot of multiple significant sources. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yip indeed. Found this:[2] That and the Times are the only two things in can find. scope_creep^Talk 14:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV even if WP:NACTOR isn't met. Sometimes one particular part is big enough to attract lots of coverage to pass the threshold of GNG if not SNG.4meter4 (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  4meter4, link to the sources you are claiming about? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have to. Scope creep already provided them.4meter4 (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep meets WP:NACTOR and GNG Lightburst (talk) 15:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep She had multiple notable roles: Rachel Towers Grange Hill and as Emmerdale as Hannah Barton. Dream Focus 16:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep she has notable roles so meets WP:NACTOR. مضحرالعجایب (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Subject passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 06:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.