Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gohar Markosjan-Käsper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jujutacular ^T · C 20:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gohar Markosjan-Käsper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. 2 hits in gnews which includes Estonian newspapers [1]. gbooks is limited. [2]. would reconsider if someone can search this in Russian. LibStar (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the references in the external link section, in particular the high-profile article on Deutschlandfunk are enough to establish notability. Pantherskin (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a translation of the Deutschlandfunk article mentioned by Pantherskin. The fact that references aren't in English is never a reason to delete a article. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The references included in the article confirm notability of the subject. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.