Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloves (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 07:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gloves (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching through Google, this has a few valid references but is unlikely to expand further than a stub article, and I would perhaps suggest merging it with Strange House. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NSONG - "1.Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts". If the nom doesn't think this is enough to pass notability, then they should raise a RFC. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yak) @ 21:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Strange House. The first line in WP:NSONGS reads: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." That is not the case here. The list in WP:NSONGS is not criteria for passing notability requirements but merely factors which may suggest notability. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per these song review sources I've found ([1] and [2]). Kokoro20 (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.